|
|
Once
again Microsoft proves that they are the
undisputed king of shady business practice
15:31 Wednesday 9th January
2002
Peter Judge
In December, Java was more popular than .Net for building Web services,
according to a ZDNet UK poll, but weeks later the position had
dramatically reversed; investigation revealed just what lengths Microsoft
will go to to promote its products
Microsoft's .Net Web services technology appeared to experience a sudden
massive boost in popularity over its rival Java, according to a poll run
by ZDNet UK.
By 21 December, more than two-thirds of the respondents (69.5 percent),
said they planned to deliver some applications by Web services by the end
of 2002, with a large majority of those (nearly half the total sample)
planning to use Java. Only 21.5 percent said they planned to use Microsoft
.Net -- less than the figure (23.5 percent) planning to use neither.
But by the time the poll closed, on 5 January, the position had
dramatically changed, with three quarters of voters claiming to be
implementing .Net. This apparent sudden change of heart over the Christmas
period appears to be the result of a concerted campaign within Microsoft.
ZDNet UK logs reveal rather obvious vote rigging, and prove that it
originated from within Microsoft:
A very high percentage of voters are from within the microsoft.com domain.
There is a very high incidence of people attempting to cast multiple
votes, even though the poll script blocked out most attempts at multiple
voting. The one that wins the prize made 228 attempts to vote. This person
was from within the microsoft.com domain.
Several of the voters evidently followed a link contained in an email, the
subject line of which ran: "PLEASE STOP AND VOTE FOR .NET!" We
know this, because our logs include the Web address where visitors browsed
from; when people click there from a Microsoft Exchange email message,
Exchange helpfully gives us the subject line and username. The people who
followed that link all had email addresses in the microsoft.com domain.
There is also clear evidence of automated voting, with scripts attempting
to post multiple times.
This is not the first time Microsoft has been caught using dubious
practices. Last August, lobbyists acting for Microsoft went beyond the
grave and dispatched letters to US states' attorneys general from two
deceased people as part of a campaign to persuade government prosecutors
to lay off the company in the antitrust case. US lobby group the Campaign
Against Government Waste (CAGW) posted the letters as part of an attempt
to convince attorneys general there was a grass-roots campaign against the
case.
Although votes cast after 21 December are suspect, this latest episode
illustrates the importance of Web services -- at least to suppliers,
anyway. The inevitable conclusion is that these are some of the first
salvos in what will be a bitter PR struggle. Microsoft may have shot
itself in the foot this time, but future efforts may be a little more
subtle.
Archived
News of The Day
|